Pulled data from the Washington Double Star database for 00057+4549STT 547. Very interesting. Way beyond what is shown in my favourite software.
discoverer | first obs | last obs | P.A. | sep | mag pri | mag sec | spectral |
STT 547AB | 1876 | 2016 | 189 | 6 | 8.98 | 9.15 | K6+M0 |
STT 547AC | 1911 | 2015 | 263 | 116.2 | 8.98 | 13.71 | K6 |
STT 547AD | 1911 | 2015 | 230 | 110.3 | 8.98 | 12.51 | K6 |
STT 547AE | 1911 | 2015 | 344 | 58.4 | 8.98 | 11.75 | K6 |
STT 547AF | 1897 | 2007 | 254 | 327.9 | 8.98 | 10.19 | K6V+M2e |
POP 217AP | 1994 | 2015 | 320 | 15.4 | 8.98 | 13.4 | K6 |
POP 217AQ | 1998 | 2006 | 130 | 20 | 8.98 | 16 | K6 |
POP 217AX | 2004 | 2006 | 222 | 12 | 8.98 | K6 | |
POP 217AY | 1998 | 2005 | 79 | 199 | 8.98 | 14.8 | K6 |
STT 547BC | 1925 | 2015 | 266 | 114.8 | 9.15 | 13.71 | M0 |
STT 547BD | 1921 | 2015 | 232 | 105.9 | 9.15 | 12.51 | M0 |
STT 547BE | 1991 | 2015 | 346 | 64 | 9.15 | 11.75 | M0 |
STT 547BF | 1961 | 2002 | 255 | 326.4 | 9.15 | 10.19 | M0 |
STT 547BP | 1989 | 2015 | 333 | 19.8 | 9.15 | 13.1 | M0 |
POP 217YG | 1998 | 2005 | 189 | 10 | 14.8 | 15.8 |
I transcribed the data from SkyTools 3 Professional.
AB | 190 | 5.89 |
AC | 356 | 54.5 |
AD | 188 | 82.2 |
AF | 268 | 84.52 |
Now, ST3P shows binary data information... The calculated values as of June 2017. AB has a 1551 year period. AF has a 83000 year period! Wow.
I flipped, zoomed, and cropped the image.
North is up; east is right (opposite the full image).
I plotted in my custom Excel workbook the A through F stars using the WDS data. There is good correspondence to my BGO image.
North is up; east is right.
I noted that the labelling between the WDS and ST3P was different. What ST3P called the C star, WDS said was E. What ST3P called star GSC 03246-1561 is C according to the WDS. From the BGO photo, I knew there was an issue with F. The WDS refers to a bright star which ST3P says is J000511.7+454706.
This means that for my log notes, I can claim to have spotted B, C, D, E, and F, according to the WDS. I have to adjust some notes from the initial observations. C is nearly due west of AB. It is extremely faint. It appears to me to be beside another star making it a pair (opposed or at a 90° angle to AB) with nearly the same separation as AB. E is to the north, about half the separation has C. F is far afield to the west.
The WDS shows observations from POP. I plotted the stars POP 217 P, Q, X, and Y. I added the STT 547 F star to maintain the scale in the graph.
P corresponds to the image quite well. It is the medium-bright nearby star to the north-north-west. ST3P calls this GSC 03246-0320. I don't see anything at the Q location. Nor the X spot. Q is listed as mag 16; X has no value. The Y star however lines up with my image with a faint star. In fact, it too seems to be part of a faint double. Their alignment is almost identical to AB, roughly north-south. It is to the east, well away. In ST3P, this is shown as J000600.2+454920 at mag 14.8.
So I think I can safely add the P and Y stars to my life list log.
The WDS catalogue lists C, D, E, F, and P associated with B. I plotted this system. Again I see a very good correlation to my image.
There's another POP 217 entry, this time for the G partner to Y. It is at position angle 189 and is 10 arc-seconds away. I see this in my image. This star is south of Y and fainter. And ST3P shows this too: GSC 03246-1853. I think I can add the G star to my log.
For clarity, I annotated the photograph.
Fascinating.
No comments:
Post a Comment