Monday, May 31, 2021
taught level 1
set up v-pub
received more apps
Sunday, May 30, 2021
certified another Moon lover
Saturday, May 29, 2021
she hates stars
heard from team member
surprised by a delivery
So it was quite lovely to receive my hard-copy edition of Dr Seager's book.
sent in the report
Friday, May 28, 2021
spotted Vega
Spotted Vega Sindoa, a Spanish Cab Sav. Grabbed a bottle.
Intense deep red. Very strong but pleasing nose. It think it's gonna be good!
Made in Navarra by Bodegas Nekeas.
§
A little harsh, with a bitter finish, immediately upon opening. Much better on day two.
signed up auditor two
learned of DDO June events
Astronomy Speakers Night: "How Ancients Predicted Eclipses" with Ron MacNaughton
Saturday, June 5, 2021, 7pm to 8:30pm
Registration link.
Sunday Sungazing
Sunday, June 6, 2021, 12:30pm to 1pm
Registration link.
Off you go.
approved a certificate
helped a Stellarium user
Thursday, May 27, 2021
helped with angles
Great suggestions, thank you. I agree, the more data points, the better. I will try more than one drift. I do have a 12.5 mm reticle eyepiece that I use for GoTo alignments. I will give this a try as well.
Good stuff.
Wednesday, May 26, 2021
attended CAO planning meeting
appointed chair
Tuesday, May 25, 2021
the wound
viewed model at 2x
Sweet.
don't panic
Monday, May 24, 2021
it is not natural
While it was not designed to establish causality, it discussed an observational study which compared lighting in satellite imagery to registered cancer cases for over 460 000 Americans. It suggests that there is a higher chance of developing thyroid cancer for people exposed to higher levels of outdoor artificial light. Perhaps it is due to disruptions in the circadian sleep patterns.
Certainly bright and constant lighting at night is not natural. We need to do whatever we can to limit or reduce this.
sent notices
reviewed app
Sunday, May 23, 2021
more testing
Saturday, May 22, 2021
drew some drawings
imaged 70 Oph for 2021 (Haliffax)
Queued a job up at the Burke-Gaffney Observatory. Once again aimed at GSC 00434 02340.
Special Observation method. North is up, east is left. LUM, 0.5 seconds, 12 exposures stacked. FITS Liberator and GIMP.
This is the sixth year of imaging!
Annual log:
2016 Aug
2017 Jul
2018 May
2019 May
2020 May
2021 May < you are here
2022 Aug
2023 May
Getting a good collection...
Friday, May 21, 2021
checked time and date
posted May '21 doubles list
§
Wow. It was 3 years ago, I think, that I first started bombarding you with double star targets during bright Moon passes. I hope you're OK with all this because I have a couple more I would like to share. :-D
Double stars punch through bright skies so you can observe them any time, anywhere!
Here's a short selection of doubles from my life list, ones I find interesting and impressive. I did not include terribly tight targets.
star | also known as | alternate catalogue(s) |
---|---|---|
HD 105288 CVn | HJ 2596 | SAO 44039, HIP 59115 |
HR 4698 | Σ1633, HD 107398 | SAO 82254, HIP 60197 |
ξ (xi) Boo | Σ1888, 37 Boo | SAO 101250, HIP 72659 |
HD 164984 | Σ2273 | SAO 17717, HIP 88071 |
HD 110886 Vir | Σ1677 | SAO 138952, HIP 62234 |
Add doubles to your observing list. They are fun, easy, sometimes challenging, interesting, colourful, and dynamic! I look forward to hearing how you did! Share your log notes.
Blake Nancarrow
astronomy at computer-ease dot com
Notable double star designations:
Σ = F. Struve, STF
OΣ = O. Struve, STT
β = Burnham, BU
forum now unusable
Thursday, May 20, 2021
tried for fix the Lenovo
asked to be let back in
§
The human steward of the Mini-Robotic Observatory renewed me. I can use the little robot again!
Wednesday, May 19, 2021
considered June 10
Checked all my astro-apps for sight lines and times.
Set Stellarium to my back yard for the general location but switched to a flat landscape.
Looks like the circumstances are:
- 57½° azimuth
- 5:43 rise time
- high percentage of coverage
I copied the Sun data from the application.
- Sun
- Type: star
- Magnitude: -24.98 (extincted to: -21.42)
- Az./Alt.: +57°30'11.7"/+0°52'52.1" (apparent)
- Ecliptic obliquity (on date): +23°26'13.9"
- IAU Constellation: Tau
- Distance: 1.015AU (151.888 M km)
- Apparent diameter: +0°31'30.3"
- Eclipse obscuration: 79.61%
- Eclipse magnitude: 0.856
From SkyTools 4 Visual Pro.
Looks like the circumstances are:
- 58° azimuth
- 5:40-ish rise time
- high percentage of coverage
Events for Cupcakes, Ontario
2021 Jun 10, Solar Eclipse:
- 04:46 First Contact, Sep= +00°30'30", Alt= -7°
- 05:40 Mid-eclipse, Sep= +00°03'09", Alt= 1°
- 06:38 Last Contact, Sep= +00°30'34", Alt= 10°
Pretty short event.
This illustrates that at sunrise for me that it is right at the half-way point. Whoa! One degree!
And then it's winding down over the next hour.
Stellarium Mobile Plus now... Using the "automatic" location.
Good correspondence.
SkySafari (basic, free). Auto location again.
Same. Same stuff.
Pulled the twilight info from SS.
- 3:11 AM astronomical twilight begins
- 4:11 AM nautical twilight begins
- 4:58 AM civil dawn
If clear, we should get a cool-looking "horned" Sun.
Found a nice web site by espace pour la vie montréal with good infographics.
If you're in Nunavut or north Québec and you are referring to the RASC Observer's Handbook, be sure to download the corrected table for the local circumstances.
Apparently U of T is planning an event but I don't know any details per se. I noted they said that "much of Canada" will see it. I'd argue that...
Of course, the Eclipsophile web site by Jay Anderson and Jennifer West has excellent information, including weather prospects.
Some random thoughts. I won't be able to share the view with other humans. I wonder how the media will blow all this out of proportion. Need to find all my solar gear, the 8-inch filter, the binocular filters, the solar glasses, the welding glass viewer thingee... Should I double-check? I think the sight line from the hill is great. Maybe I'll review my comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) photos from 7 Jul '20.
It's a work-day but I am thinking I'll go to the water tower hill before dawn and watch the Sun-Moon rise!
helped at speaker event
never ending
Tuesday, May 18, 2021
and another!
learned of DDO events for May
- Up in the Sky: Friday, May 21, 2021, 9-10:30 PM EDT
- Ask an Astronomer: Sunday, May 30, 2021, 1-2 PM EDT
Visit the Richmond Hill web site for more information and to reserve.
Monday, May 17, 2021
logged in!
another rehearsal
downloaded the June Journal
Looks like a good one.
There is an article on amateurs and the Hubble Space Telescope. Another in the series on the biological effects of light pollution. The Toronto Centre's Katrina Ince-Lum has submitted a piece on astronomer Caroline Herschel. Chris Beckett talks about building your own observing program with emphasis on paper charts. I look forward to John Percy's recollection of 60 years in RASC. Lots of fantastic astroimages of course with Jeff Booth getting the front cover!
Toronto Centre members represent!
My Binary Universe column is entitled “Stellarium in Your Pocket.” I review the latest version of Stellarium Mobile and Stellarium Mobile Plus. It is impressive.
§
I understand the Journal is now available to the public. Download it now. Enjoy!
Sunday, May 16, 2021
could this be the beginning of the end?
I came across an article at The Verge on the Starlink wireless satellite internet system. It's a very interesting piece, I was captivated, intrigued, perturbed, and angered as I read through it.
The author, Nilay Patel, does not give the system a thumb's up. Now, their assessment of performance is likely limited by location. And, in theory, when more units fill in gaps in the constellation, reliability and speed will improve. Good and a bad thing...
But what was most fascinating to me was the depth of the article. The author touched on many related matters. There are a dozen URL links I need to follow up on.
Also, they really came out bashing the telcos for dropping the ball. Yes. Yes, indeed. And it is interesting to note that there's as big a problem in the US and A as in rural Canada. The Great Divide. Made more apparent with a global pandemic! It sheds some light on the recent activities of our little ISP on the Blue Mountain.
What dismayed me the most though was the remark said that people are now so desperate for decent internet service and they are so fed up with the telcos that they are saying "fuck telescopes" and they don't care about the impact in terms of light and radio spectrum pollution. It is very "damning."
And that made me very sad.
If Musk and others say fuck visual and radio astronomy then this hobby might be soon dead.
empty chair
Saturday, May 15, 2021
tested with Ninja
Thursday, May 13, 2021
Wednesday, May 12, 2021
spotted blue
questions and no answers
reviewed another vid
Monday, May 10, 2021
got everyone talking
Sunday, May 09, 2021
inspected and prepared
short session (Blue Mountains)
Had a lot of gear for the occultation—that happened on Friday night, above clouds. I was not planning to do any astrophotography tonight. Too tired. Sore back. Sore knee. From all the maintenance stuff and bumpy lawn. Not sleep shifted.
Mount: Paramount ME
Method: Go To
Lots of layers on.
As the GBO computer had died, I needed to use my netbook to drive the Paramount. Had not done it for a while. Fished the serial cable through the counter port. Connected my old Prolific USB-serial adapter, IDed the port (COM5), started TheSky6, powered up the mount, opened the roof, configured the COM port in TS6, connected, and homed. Good!
10:05 PM. Minimised the Bisque app, started SkyTools 3 Pro, red mode, found my prepared list with 33 targets, switched to visual mode from photographic, changed location, set date/time, chose the 16-inch RC, reset the filters.
Venus was gone. Mercury would set at 10:30 PM. gamma Sex was setting. Switched to Real Time mode. Location wrong, instrument wrong. Ugh. Reset everything. HD 79552 or STF 1327. Yep. A "view again" object. Opened the Interactive Atlas. Moved it to the external monitor. Opened the eyepiece simulator and put it on monitor 2. Turned on the constellations. Activated the ASCOM control, TheSky controlled option... Connected. Good!
The list jostled. Where did the HD star go? No matter. Chose γ Sex and slewed. Aubrey said "Slew aborted." Huh? Why? Tried a slew in TheSky. It seemed to be working fine. I noticed the blinking X was not showing in SkyTools. Did I not ordinarily see it? Right-clicked near M44, the Beehive. Tried a slew command again from ST3P and it seemed to work. Grabbed the 55mm Plössl and headed to the 'scope. Caps off. Was working OK. Took the 10mm Tele Vue to the refractor.
Focused on both instruments but nothing showed. Checked TS6. It was way off. Weird. Checked date, time, location, etc. All appeared fine. Slewed to M44 from the official app. It moved to the target. That was good. Bad seeing.
Tried Algieba, gamma Leonis, in SkyTools. It worked. Looked fine in refractor, peanut-shaped. Split in big gun. Separation: 4.5 arc-seconds. Golden stars. Off a bit but visible in the refractor and I was able to easily centre with the joystick.
Rhonda came into the Warm Room, startling me. Crikey. She had a look then went for a walk.
Tony texted me and I viewed my phone under the red film of the faulty computer. We talked about me taking it home to my workshop. There's a light burnt out on one side...
Checked the sep. and position of gamma Sex. Yowzers. No way. Too low.
Next. Σ1327. From the RASC Observer's Handbook, the Coloured Doubles list. Slewed. Looked OK. Everything seemed to be working fine now. Ah... couldn't figure out the field. I knew north was up (more or less). Pointing as off. Software issues pissing me off.
SkyTools updated the real-time list and what I was lookin' at disappeared. Grrr.
Turned down the heater.
Hunted. An arc of three stars. Couldn't figure out the field... Had another look. Manually solved it. Determine I needed to move the mount left.
10:42. Got it! Finally landed on target. Yellow, orange, and orange? Or was C blue? Faint star to the north. NE according to ST3P. Three or four, five, times the distance, in line, another star. Orange colour. Hard time getting the colour. Bluish or greenish? Coming and going. Neat field stars. Roughly a circular shape to the SE. A few field stars. Looked for notes in the observing list. Nope. Loaded Lumpy and looked up my Cancer star. The logged colours matched my current impressions.
Rhonda gave a distant early warning before returning to the Warm Room, thank the Universe.
C and D are 2.2". I really wanted to get them... But would the poor seeing allow it?
Told rho about η (eta) Aquarid meteor shower.
We went to the observatory floor. We talked about star colours. Additive colour models. Proximity of different colour points. The psychology. Perception. Rhonda headed to the house.
Once again, inconclusive. I could not split C and D. I wondered if they were oriented at a 45 degree angle to A-B-C. A and B were at roughly at an 11 o'clock alignment. So that meant that north was down and left. I thought C and D were north-south. SkyTools showed different. D mag 11, C 10.2. I needed perfect seeing at the current power. I went to higher power but it made the view too soft. Too much. Had the 10mm in the RC16. Pretty high magnification. No joy.
Slewed to Bode's, for Rhonda. Two-In-The-View in the refractor. When my phone finally woke up, I pinged rho. I spoke, "I have two lovely faint fuzzies for you." Google thought I said "I have two lovely pink fuzzies for you." Sheesh. Rhonda replied, "omw."
I shared that the Big Dipper, the host asterism, was straight up. "This is the best view you're gonna get. Like it or lump it." We took in the refractor view. Luke warm.
Oh my. Rhonda spotted a train of satellites. We went to the Observing Pad for a Good sight line. We saw about 20 to 30 satellites moving from the north-north-west through north to fade out in Cassiopeia. I thought of the caller from late Friday night.
We saw a good meteor. It came from behind us. Must have been an Aquarid. That was serendipitous.
11:14. We returned to the GSO Ritchey-Chrétien telescope. Then I centred on the edge-on The Cigar Galaxy and we examined it in the large OTA. Averted vision showed the middle of M82 was traversed with dark bands. I thought it quite good. We switched to M81. I'm never really been bowled over with canted Messier 81. Soft, diffuse. Visually. Good photographers can pull out structure.
[ed: I should have interesting factoids handy.]
Rhonda was cold. I pulled up the weather page. No wind. No direction. Wait a minute. Everything reported by the Davis weather station was blank. Oh... The battery in the roof-top ISS was dead; only when the Sun was out hitting the solar panel did we receive exterior data.
I enjoyed a cherry Nibs string.
Slewed to the Owl (Messier 97, M97). Big. But no detail. No obvious eyes. Not satisfying. What?! It was right overhead. I was expecting a much better view! We talked about morphology, respectful names for planetaries, etc. Asked for any requests. How about a neat double. I showed Cor Caroli. She liked it.
Rhonda called it quits. I suggested a quick check for aurora. Nope.
I thought about my winter coat... But I was feeling so sore and tired, I didn't think it worth it...
11:41. Next? Canes Venatici? Decided to skip tight doubles. Or peculiar DSOs. I felt cold. Turned the ceramic heater up a bit. 17 Com? No. Too tight.
What about Alula Borealis aka nu? From the View Again list. Going down... With a backwards L in the field. That was neat! 18mm was in the big 'scope. West was down and left for me. Fire trucking wild. B. Yep. I saw a faint star inline. Oh. Only a double. Remarkably different. Over six magnitudes different. Primary was yellow. Secondary was a dull yellow. Very distant field star that was blue. Fantastic double! Pulled the telescope report from ST3P: I was at 181 power. Huh. Struve 1524. Seven arc-seconds. Field star was at 8 o'clock; B was at 4. Wide, easily split. But so faint compared to the A star. A little bit of goodness.
Tried for target in Corvus. Lots of hits at Cupcakes; maybe I was using a small instrument?
Knee was sore.
Oops. Went to wrong star.
Sunday 9 May 2021, 0:00 PM. Another View Again target. Did not see anything in the 101mm Tele Vue. 81 Leo. Yellow and blue stars in the RC16. Very different in magnitude. Very wide at 181x. Noticed star GSC 1437-727 to the NW, then further out 1737-1401, almost in a straight line. No problem with A and B. B was at 11 or 10 o'clock. Easy. Saw the faint one... Formed an L. NE. Flick off! SkyTools said it was magnitude 15.4! Wow. Was the transparency really good. Left the deck to dig out the B star in the small OTA...
Heard helicopters in Clarksburg. Bright lights. Felt new... Lake of foliage?
I did see it in the refractor. But it was one of those peculiar situations where it disappeared in the blind spot of the left eye. I had to force myself to look right of the primary to make the secondary of 81 Leonis appear.
Above, to the north. I also noted the faint GSC stars.
Really tired. Not in the mood for more. That's it, I decided. Performed a graceful shutdown... Went to the floor to quickly close out things.
12:14 AM. Rapidly closed out the Warm Room.
Looked down to Thornbury and Clarksburg from the deck. Helicopter still going. Weird.
Creaked and moaned into bed.
Short session but I was happy to get some View Again doubles split. Good to see a meteor. Good to briefly enjoy dark skies.
Friday, May 07, 2021
noted the link on CN
Thursday, May 06, 2021
stopped the forum deluge
Wednesday, May 05, 2021
tried to help Chris
Chris V had pinged me in the afternoon.
He asked, "Do you have notes on HD 198626, the foreground double star in the middle of the Cygnus Loop?" Was he observing now? Was Cygnus up?!
With my phone, I checked my double star life list. No hits. I looked up the DS in Stelle Doppie. Burnham (BU) 67. Looked to me like a tight double of unequal stars. Simple double. No other stars. I pinged back, a little late.
Chris agreed. But he encouraged me to centre on it in Stellarium. "You'd be left with the impression that there's a great DS there." Now I was intrigued. I hopped out from my toasty covers and grabbed John Gomez.
Searched by the Henry Draper number. Landed in the middle of the Veil supernova remnant. Chris had said the star was labelled B67 but I noted β 67. Beta, followed by a number, so BU or Burnham.
I zoomed to half a degree and saw a pleasing double. Yellow and blue stars. But I had a feeling that was not what Chris was after. Zoom in more and the HD star split. Ah ha. There was the true double. The Stellarium application showed a position angle of 311° and a separation of 1.48". This closely matched the data in SD. The B star was to the north-west.
A very tight double. Three magnitudes different in brightness.
Chris said, "I was going to highlight it. Not now."
Oh. It sounded like he was writing an article and looking for a fun double.
He went on to say that "SkySafari looked correct." I knew he had the Pro but I still fired up the free basic SS on the motorola. And zoomed in tight. I was not surprised that it didn't show all the stars. But the data for the double was in the Object Info panel and, again, aligned.
Chris shared, "I checked WDS and your life list this afternoon, after sending you that message."
It dawned on me after a moment. Holy moley. Somebody actually used my double star life list table. Wow!
I relayed my findings in Stellarium. "Zooming on Burnham 67, I see the tight double at 1.5 arc seconds. I also see at about a 90° angle another star but it's 26 arc seconds away."
He said, "In Stellarium it's labelled with a Greek Beta. Not at the computer right now, but Stellarium seemed to have a nicely resolved close pair, uneven mags, oriented 11-5."
Sounded like the β was throwing Chris. And the 11-5 reference was without context. Was this equatorial or real-time?
In equatorial orientation, HD 198626 A and B were to the north while the distant star, unlabelled in Stellarium, was to the south. Almost 12 and 6. Maybe 11:30 and 5:30.
He added, "SkySafari doesn't show them as that pair." I think he meant the distant star at 26 arc-seconds.
Then, "It's moot, I think. I decided to delete the reference to it in my Veil piece. I was curious if you had seen it."
For some possibly easier targets, easier than BU 67, I suggested 52 Cygni. Or HD 198627.
§
Today I followed up.
Confirmed my suspicion this was for a magazine article.
Ensured Chris was clear about the use of beta. Shared other odd designations with symbols. Sent wide field snap shots from SkyTools. No bright easy doubles in the Loop. Echoed my experience 10 years prior with Stellarium...
And finally did a deep dive with SkyTools 4 Visual Pro. There was no star shown 26" away and south of HD 198626. So doubly bad (no pun intended) for Stellarium.
I checked Aladin too. No mag 9 star south of the HD pair...
watched SN15 land
monitored the Tube
tried a redo on NGC 6503
Tuesday, May 04, 2021
received STF 1686 good data (Halifax)
accessed centre site
proofed Binary Universe piece
Monday, May 03, 2021
learned of sync issue
taught level 2 again
Sunday, May 02, 2021
tried to image STF 1686 (Halifax)
The double star also known as STF 1686 or HIP 62852 is in Com and has a quoted separation of 5.7 seconds of arc. I had found this suggestion in Haas's book and was curious about the colours...
I sent the Burke-Gaffney Observatory (with SBIG camera) on a mission...
The seeing was poor and that has made the stars look more like bubbles. But there's clearly a vertically aligned rod shape here.
I'll have to try imaging again to see if I can get a clean split...
§
Imaged two nights later with a better result.